The review itself was fine and I agree with most of it. I think the problem is the clickbait/exaggeratedly negative title. It sets the wrong tone for the whole article. There were actually plenty of positive things said in the article, but after reading the title you can't help but think the reviewer saw the whole show as a complete disaster.

Personally I give nights 1 and 2 4-star ratings for all the great moments they had (and night 3 was awesome enough to be a 5-star). Maybe I'm being generous due to the many shows earlier this year that were so lackluster in comparison; who knows. But I like what they've been doing since Dick's, fall tour, Vegas, etc. and am optimistic about next year.