Permalink for Comment #1375147407 by TwiceBitten

, comment by TwiceBitten
TwiceBitten @waxbanks said:
@sethadam1 said:
@waxbanks said:
that is not their assertion, no.
Well, yeah, kinda... it was, Wally. Either the review is positive, or one should "stay home."
i did not read those comments as demanding positive reviews, only less 'jaded' (as they say). your gloss struck me as defensive in a wagons-circling way. that's understandable but i don't like it.

i haven't heard the show and have nothing else to add here.
Kind of silly to be arguing this when said reviewer praised the first set. I'm personally jaded enough to have found all of set one boring.
Score: 0    
Phish.net Login
Secure Login
Register | Forgot Password
Support Phish.net & Mbird
Make a Donation
Phish.net is a project of the non-profit Mockingbird Foundation.
Recent Blog Posts
Crossing Continents and Finding Phish: A European Phan’s Tale 2024-12-26
From the Forum: 'Twas the Week Before New Year's 2024-12-24
Results of the 9th Runaway Open 2024-11-02
Albany3 Recap: Never Play It The Same Way Once 2024-10-29
Albany2 Recap: The Use of Keys to Every Door 2024-10-27
Albany1 Recap: A Requiem For Phil 2024-10-26
Surrender To The Flow #86: Albany Divided Sky Benefit 2024 2024-10-23
HAPPY 60TH BIRTHDAY, TREY! 2024-09-30
Phish Studies 101 webinar almost here! 2024-09-23
From the Forum 2: "Mike's Song" in late '92 and "Weekapaug Groove" in early '93 2024-09-19


Phish.net

Phish.net is a non-commercial project run by Phish fans and for Phish fans under the auspices of the all-volunteer, non-profit Mockingbird Foundation.

This project serves to compile, preserve, and protect encyclopedic information about Phish and their music.

Credits | Terms Of Use | Legal | DMCA

© 1990-2024  The Mockingbird Foundation, Inc.