Permalink for Comment #1357244931 by waxbanks

, comment by waxbanks
waxbanks @safetymeeting said:
@waxbanks said:

ok here's a more specific comparison: how many deadheads often listen, now, to their pre-1970 music, or even pre-1971 or -72? for me, that stuff is like 80s phish -- amazing music from a different band i don't feel any desire to listen to.
I don't often listen to pre-'70 GD, but when I listen to '72 - '78, I have a nagging tug from somewhere telling me I'm not listening to the 'genuine article'.
interesting. i can't imagine what post-pigpen gdead was like for folks who came up with the first version of that band. luckily, phish haven't undergone any transformations during my fandom that have permanently alienated me. :)
Score: 0    
Phish.net Login
Secure Login
Register | Forgot Password
Support Phish.net & Mbird
Make a Donation
Phish.net is a project of the non-profit Mockingbird Foundation.
Recent Blog Posts
Crossing Continents and Finding Phish: A European Phan’s Tale 2024-12-26
From the Forum: 'Twas the Week Before New Year's 2024-12-24
Results of the 9th Runaway Open 2024-11-02
Albany3 Recap: Never Play It The Same Way Once 2024-10-29
Albany2 Recap: The Use of Keys to Every Door 2024-10-27
Albany1 Recap: A Requiem For Phil 2024-10-26
Surrender To The Flow #86: Albany Divided Sky Benefit 2024 2024-10-23
HAPPY 60TH BIRTHDAY, TREY! 2024-09-30
Phish Studies 101 webinar almost here! 2024-09-23
From the Forum 2: "Mike's Song" in late '92 and "Weekapaug Groove" in early '93 2024-09-19


Phish.net

Phish.net is a non-commercial project run by Phish fans and for Phish fans under the auspices of the all-volunteer, non-profit Mockingbird Foundation.

This project serves to compile, preserve, and protect encyclopedic information about Phish and their music.

Credits | Terms Of Use | Legal | DMCA

© 1990-2024  The Mockingbird Foundation, Inc.