Permalink for Comment #1357095667 by waxbanks

, comment by waxbanks
waxbanks @MirthBeatenWorkr said:
Elf,

Though I think you're wrong, I respect your point of view. I've enjoyed a lot of 3.0 Phish, though little of it touched Phish in its heyday. You may think that's being subjective, but most people who know Phish 1.0, 2.0, and 3.0 agree with me.
wow, i haven't seen the word 'subjective' subjected to such graphic violence in a long, long time

i think of myself as a fellow who knows a little bit about a little bit
not a towering intellect but a decent man trying to think it through,

very very handsome but modest;

and i can't help thinking that

--> kindly pay attention

a man who comes to a phish fansite in 2012 to say 'they'll never be as good as they were when clinton was president and THOSE ARE FACTS' or whatever the shit

is not hearing what he needs to hear
and could use a breather.


Phish.net

Phish.net is a non-commercial project run by Phish fans and for Phish fans under the auspices of the all-volunteer, non-profit Mockingbird Foundation.

This project serves to compile, preserve, and protect encyclopedic information about Phish and their music.

Credits | Terms Of Use | Legal | DMCA

© 1990-2024  The Mockingbird Foundation, Inc.