Permalink for Comment #1369236605 by bl002e

, comment by bl002e
bl002e @andrewrose said:
I think the hint was totally fine. Sure it threw a lot of us off a bit, but I think it was pretty clear that it was definitely not from 2000. It may have taken a bit of MJM knowledge to decipher it, but based on the megaphone sound that @Choda was pretty sure about, there's plenty of reason to think we could have figured it out even without the hint.
Yeah, @Choda was getting very close with his spot-on analysis of the delay looping and megaphone. Regarding the hint, I do acknowledge its trickiness, but you guys have proven that even the most subtle of hints can lead you to victory.

Looking forward to next week's inevitable five-minute MJM identification.
Score: 0    
Phish.net Login
Secure Login
Register | Forgot Password
Support Phish.net & Mbird
Make a Donation
Phish.net is a project of the non-profit Mockingbird Foundation.
Recent Blog Posts
Results of the 9th Runaway Open 2024-11-02
Albany3 Recap: Never Play It The Same Way Once 2024-10-29
Albany2 Recap: The Use of Keys to Every Door 2024-10-27
Albany1 Recap: A Requiem For Phil 2024-10-26
Surrender To The Flow #86: Albany Divided Sky Benefit 2024 2024-10-23
HAPPY 60TH BIRTHDAY, TREY! 2024-09-30
Phish Studies 101 webinar almost here! 2024-09-23
From the Forum 2: "Mike's Song" in late '92 and "Weekapaug Groove" in early '93 2024-09-19
Summer Tour 2024 Reprise 2024-09-15
The First and Last Words from Dick's 2024-09-07


Phish.net

Phish.net is a non-commercial project run by Phish fans and for Phish fans under the auspices of the all-volunteer, non-profit Mockingbird Foundation.

This project serves to compile, preserve, and protect encyclopedic information about Phish and their music.

Credits | Terms Of Use | Legal | DMCA

© 1990-2024  The Mockingbird Foundation, Inc.